BIBLICAL FRAGMENTS
FROM
MOUNT SINAI
EDITED BY
r RENDEL HARRIS,
FORMERLY FELLOW OF CLARE COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE,
AND NOW PROFESSOR OF BIBLICAL LANGUAGES IN HAVERFORD COLLEGE, PENNSYLVANIA.
LONDON :
C. J. CLAY AND SONS, CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS WAREHOUSE.
1890
PRINTED BY C. J. CLAY, M.A. AND SONS, AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS.
BIBLICAL FRAGMENTS FROM MOUNT SINAI.
THE fragments in the present volume were examined by me during my visit to the Convent of St Catharine in the Spring of the present year (1889). It had long been my desire to make this journey and to combine the studies of two subjects of unequalled interest to the Biblical inquirer, viz. the route of the Exodus, and the library of the Monastery. And it is with much satisfaction and thankfulness that I find, on looking back over the fifteen days spent in the desert between Suez and Sinai, and the seventeen days of residence in the Convent, that my interest was on either hand well rewarded. This is not the place to ventilate my own theories of the Exodus, nor to discuss the views of earlier and better explorers than .myself : it is sufficient to say that I have secured for myself an extremely strong conviction both of the fact of the Exodus and concerning its line of motion, which I reckon to be the richer for possessing. But with regard to the Convent and its treasures, I am glad to lay before those who are still interested in these matters, as I hope all good Christians are, some of the results of my inquiries and examinations.
There is much to discourage anyone who proposes to make a journey to Mount Sinai in the interests of Biblical Criticism ; the suc cesses as well as the failures of previous visitors have great deterrent force ; the latter, because they intimate that there is no useful work to do ; the former, because they suggest that all the useful work has been done already ; and it is surprising how powerfully both of these considera tions work in the case in question. Tischendorf discovered the Codex Sinaiticus on Mount Sinai, therefore there are no more books of any value left in the Convent. Gardthausen catalogued all the Greek MSS. in the library, and the catalogue is a disappointing one ; there is there fore nothing but disappointment for subsequent travellers. But a little careful study of accessible information would shew how fallacious such reasonings are. For example, Coxe in his report to Her Majesty's Government on the state of the Libraries in the Levant, expressly states that he avoided Sinai because it had been recently visited by Tischen-
IV
dorf '; I believe I am right in stating that at the time when he camu to this resolution (in January, 1857), the Sinaitic Codex was still lying in its time-honoured retreat, where in fact it would be to-day if the ordinary conventions concerning the rights of property had been scrupulously regarded. And but for this timidity on Coxe's part there would have been another sentence added to his report, which I imagine would have run, judging from his language in similar cases, something as follows: "You can imagine, Sir, with what eagerness I endeavoured to secure this inestimable treasure for our National Col lection ; but the monks were far more alive, than I had suspected, to the value of their documents, and while willing to lend every assistance to those desirous of studying them, even to the extent of sending them to the branch convent at Cairo, they would by no means consent to their alienation."
Thirteen years after the publication of the Sinaitic Codex, a few additional uncial fragments of the Old Testament were published by Brugsch Beya ; he supposed them to belong to the Sinaitic Codex, and published them as such, although the merest glance on the part of anyone who was acquainted with the Sinaitic Codex would shew that this was a misapprehension. I venture to think that the disappoint ment caused by the correction of Brugsch's error has outweighed the interest which should have been generated by the discovery of a portion of a new and unknown Fourth Century MS. within the Convent walls. Many such MSS. must have existed there, for, although we have not succeeded in finding the Codex to which the Brugsch-Bey fragments belong, we have found that there are plenty of Biblical fragments of the fourth, fifth, sixth and subsequent centuries in the library ; and it is not to be assumed that there are no others because we have not found them, or because they do not happen to be mentioned in Gardt- hausen's catalogue. I make these remarks, because it is important that all the encouragements which are right should be given to any students who have the necessary leisure and opportunities for Eastern research. There is plenty of treasure for those who are prepared to buy the field that contains it.
There can be little doubt that the publication of the catalogue of Gardthausen has caused a great subsidence in the interest which was generally felt in the library of the Sinaitic Convent ; it is not exactly that the mountain has produced a mouse, but rather an enormous tribe
1 Report, p. 7. "At Mount Sinai after the visit of so eminent a paleographer and critic as Dr Tischendorf, to say nothing of the visits of many other literary men, there could be nothing which would justify the hope of discovering anything which had escaped their practised eyes."
2 Neue Bruchstiicke cles Codex Sinaiticus aufgefunden in der Bibliothek des Sinai Klosters und veroffentlicht von Dr Heinrich Brugsch-Bey (Leipzig, 1875).
of mice. Scholars care absolutely nothing tor tin- long list of service- books ;ui<l psalters in the catalogue; only a few <»f tln-m Mar too few) are interested in the army of copies of the Gospels. Hut, they <l«. care very much to be told, what we freely tell them, that there are precious collections of unknown value on Sinai in the Syriac, Arabic and IWi.-m languages; and that, amongst them, to take a single example, will be found the Syriac version of the long-lost Apology of Aristides to the Emperor Hadrian on behalf of the Christians; and that the limitation of the Gardthausen catalogue to the Greek MSS. in the library ought not to be allowed to operate prejudicially in re-.-ml to Oriental books, nor even to be taken too conclusively as comprehending all the Greek literature of the Convent.
I believe the time has come when every additional scrap of know ledge as to the state of these Eastern libraries should be published: it is not a case of administering information to a many-headed beast, for in this department the labourers are very few, and sometimes one fears that they are becoming fewer : to throw a veil over one's move ments, and to hide more than one tells of the quarters from which manuscripts come will, in the end, result only in the development of suspicion as to the methods by which the books or fragments were acquired : while a proper amount of publicity is a safeguard alike to the ownership of persons who are unwilling to part with their property, and to the reputation of those who may have succeeded by lawful means in acquiring it.
We have intimated above that there is some danger of a decline of interest in Biblical and Patristic studies in Europe ; in the East, how ever, one finds frequent and cheering tokens of revival and extension of study ; and one can only feel, as we come across the tracks of the scholarly Russians and Greeks in the Eastern libraries, that they have a bright work before them, and that the receiving of their co-operation will be life from the dead. There are many signs of this reviving interest; I will only give one specimen, and others will suggest themselves readily enough. It is not generally known that the numerical arrangement of the Sinai library, and the first catalogue of it (a beautiful MS. catalogue written in Greek), are due to the Russian Archimandrite Antoninus, now resident in Jerusalem, where I had the pleasure of visiting him and seeing his beautiful collections of antiquities, inscriptions, and Biblical and other manuscripts. This catalogue he presented to the Sinai library, and it is the basis of the work of Gardthausen, who used it, as he tells us, every day during his stay there, and who mentions the Archimandrite in his preface, though obscurely1. One cannot but feel that where advanced pa-
1 As ' Monachus qniclam.'
loographical work can be done in the unassuming way which this catalogue suggests, that the future of these studies must belong to the Greeks and Russians.
There is much to be desired in regard to the arrangement of the books in the possession of the Convent ; the collection which is usually shewn to travellers consists only of late paper MSS., plus the facsimile of their lost and ever-deplored Codex ; the treasures on early vellum are either found in the care of the Warden (S/eet/o^vXaf), as in the case of the Brugsch fragments, the Thoodosian Gospels, or the Cassiaii Psalter, or else they are stored in chests, or laid on various shelves under the care of the librarian. Want of adequate funds prevents the monks at present from furnishing a complete library in which all the MSS. might be stored.
If, however, a deficiency has been noted in the storage and arrange ment of the books, in the cordiality with which a student is welcomed there will be found no lack. I cannot recall any places in the East where I met a warmer welcome or more genuine Christian sympathy. The Warden freely gave me access to the treasures which were in his especial care; and my friend Galaktion, the steward and librarian of the Convent, sat with me day after day, often at much personal in convenience, and spared no care or thoughtfulness in searching for those documents in which he imagined I should be specially interested ; and beyond all Greek courtliness and intellectual sympathy, I had the frequent fellowship of Photius, the exiled patriarch of Jerusalem, a brother beloved in the faith and patience of Jesus Christ.
I believe it is said that visitors to Rome who drink of the water of the fountain of Trevi become possessed by a spirit which ultimately compels them to return : I venture to affirm that a like potency resides in the .water of the spring of Jethro.
Description of Fragments.
We shall now give in detail a description of the several fragments which are printed in this work. And a few preliminary remarks are necessary in explanation of the types and notation which are employed.
It is out of the question to attempt to represent by special type the various hands that are found in manuscript fragments belonging to such diverse periods of time ; but we have done what we could, by means of the types in the possession of the University Press, to suggest some differences of calligraphy, and to distinguish between what has been actually read, what may possibly be read by keener eyes than our own, and what is absent from the text in consequence of the torn and imperfect state of the manuscript. Accordingly we usually employ a large type for a large hand, though there are some
exceptions; we often use the ordinary (Jivrk lyjn- !<>r what is missing, brackets for what is uncertain or illegible, and an nncial or inscription type for what has been read. In many cases it will be found that only one side of the page or fragment has been transcribed : this arises, generally speaking, from the fact that the scraps of vellum are taken from bindings of books, and from one side of the vellum the writing has wholly perished. In some cases the fragments have been rudely nailed on long boards, and the librarian is naturally averse to having the nails removed, simply for the sake of seeing whether any letters can possibly be made out on the reverse side. In all these cases then the portions quoted furnish a recto leaf, but no verso.
The work of transcription was necessarily rapid ; the fragments were copied as fast as they were obtained, nor was there usually either time or opportunity for a revision of the transcripts: but the work has in a number of cases been checked by photographs. It is reason able to suppose that, with the advance that is being made towards the production of an easily-handled and portable photographic appa ratus, the copying of MSS. by hand will soon be a thing of the past. My own experience in these matters is slight, but it may be men tioned that I brought back with me from Sinai between three and four hundred photographs of MSS., and did not burden myself with more apparatus than an ordinary camera fitted with an Eastman roll- holder, and a manuscript holder made to my order by Mr Crouch, the optician1.
No. 1.
This fragment consists of a single leaf, from which the writing has almost disappeared, either by the lapse of time or by actual erasure. It contains Numbers xxxii. 29, 30 in a hand of the seventh century, or earlier.
No. 2.
The two upper portions of text are a piece which has been cut from the top of a leaf, and they are glued over the longer piece, which evi dently was, at one time, a part of the same leaf, so that a part of the larger fragment is covered by the smaller. The contained matter is from Judges xx. A few letters can be made out in the 23rd verse of the chapter, which is partly covered over, viz. :
. . r .
. . €N
oy
6N
His address is No. 3, Barbican, Lon Ion.
Vlll
which must have stood in line somewhat as follows : K.W Xepoz'Te? et 7rpo<t
{3evia/jLiv
THIWV Kai «9 ava^r/re
The MS. consisted, then, of at least two columns of writing on each page, and each column of not less than 37 lines to the page ; we are unable to tell how many lines are wanting to complete the page, or how many more columns there may have been.
The MS. is in the beauty of its writing very similar to the style of the Vatican Codex. It must certainly be referred to the fourth century. A single letter at the beginning of the line is sometimes enlarged a little, as we have represented in the type ; and such a letter projects a very little from the line.
No. 3.
This page is made up of two pieces of a fourth century uncial MS. pasted upon opposite sides of a piece of cardboard, and consequently legible upon one side only; as in the previous case the pieces overlap one another. By laying the fragments in order, it is possible to restore nearly the whole of the two columns of writing of which the frag ments consist.
The MS. was, therefore, at least bicolumnar, and there were 43 lines to a page : the hand is of the fourth century, and is so similar to that of the previous fragment (No. 2) that, taking into account that they came from neighbouring parts of the Scripture, and that the para graph letter in each MS. stands back very slightly from the line, we may assume that the two fragments from Judges and Ruth are a part of the same MS.
A comparison of the arrangement of the text with that of the Vatican Codex is instructive : the building of the paragraphs is very similar; for example, in col. 1, line 16, we have the very same short line in Codex B. In col. 1, line 43, the short line appears again in B. In col. 2, line 32, we have a fresh line in B, and so in col. 2, line 40. These instances are sufficient to shew the similarity of the structure of the paragraphs in the lost Codex to the Vatican Codex.
No. 4.
No. 4 represents a collection of nine fragments, which are nailed, five on one board, and four on another. They evidently belonged at
one time to the s.-ime MS. The vellum is extremely thin and tran>- parent, the writing very delicate, and certainly of the fourth century. The reverse sides are almost illegible, although some attempt has been made to retrace the faded letters, and occasionally a rubricated 'A\- \rj\ovia can be detected.
The size of the pages originally may be determined from the frag ment 4 d, which evidently formed at one time an adjacent leaf or column to the fragment 4 e ; by supplying the missing lines at the bottom of the first fragment we may conclude that the pages or columns contained about 25 lines. We may probably test the accuracy of this conclusion by remarking that in fragment 4c, line 15, a rubri cated 'AXX^Xouta is visible through the vellum on the opposite side. This belongs to the beginning of the next Psalm (Ps. cvi.). The dis tance between the two passages is about 31 lines of the Psalter in the Codex Sinaiticus, which need not be discordant from our previous esti mate.
The fragment 4 i shews similar rubrics under the ninth and four teenth lines, which belong respectively to the commencement of the 116th and 117th Psalms. The rubric appears also in line 17 of the fragment. Upon the whole the MS. seems to have been monocolumnar, and about 25 lines to the page: it must have been a beautiful MS. before it was mutilated, the vellum rivalling in delicacy the finest early Codices. It is difficult to describe the dimensions of such irregular forms as these shreds and fragments ; but we may note that fragment 4 d (i.e. as far as line 21 on the page) is 6| inches by 7 inches, nearly.
No. 5.
No. 5 consists of two palimpsest leaves of the Wisdom of the Son of Sirach. The MS. is not from Mount Sinai ; but it seemed best to insert it here, although it comes really from Jerusalem. The two leaves are supplementary leaves in the famous copy of the Septua- gint in the library of the Patriarch of Jerusalem (= Cod. 2. S. Sep.) and the text of Sirach having been expunged, they were employed to fill up lacunae in the MS. The MS. which they thus serve is a very ancient one, and may be suspected to be the earliest cursive MS. in existence. In a reference which I made to it in the first number of Haverford College Studies, I spoke rather slightingly of the extrava gant antiquity which Coxe gave to this MS. in his report on the Greek MSS. of the Levant ; but I am inclined to think now that Coxe was not far from the truth when he said that the MS. was of the eighth century : a surprising age indeed, but it was certainly much older than any cursive MS. yet known. Its text, too, is of the highest importance.
s. I. b
This reflection upon the age and beauty of the MS. will not date the palimpsest portion, which must be determined on its own merits : the underwriting is a beautiful uncial of the sixth century, or perhaps it may be as late as the seventh. In view of the im portance of this MS. for the text of Sirach, I am sorry not to have spent more time upon it: and in particular that I did not read more of the verso of the first leaf. The writing is fairly legible, though sometimes covered by the later text of the Octateuch, so as to be practically lost. The MS. has two columns to the page, and 36 lines to each column ; the size of each page being 13 inches x 10. The two leaves of the palimpsest will be found in the S. Sepulchre MS., at the 56th and 27th leaves respectively.
No. 6.
A single leaf of uncial writing, measuring 4 inches by 4^. The uncials are large and slope to the right, and the writing is rather coarse. The breathings are of the square type, but tending towards the round form, and there are accents. It may probably be referred to the eighth century.
No. 7.
This is a small fragment of vellum glued to a piece of board, which is perhaps a part of the cover of some book. The writing is very early, and I do not see how to date it later than the fifth century. There are a few traces of punctuation. The most remarkable point, how ever, is that at the bottom of the page there are traces of a harmony ; the reference to the Gospel of Mark and the number sixty-five shew that the scribe is giving the Eusebian canon, for the 148th section of Matthew corresponds to the 65th in Mark. And these stand in the sixth of the canonical tables of Eusebius, which gives the parallel pas sages in Matthew and Mark only. We may be sure therefore that the MS. from which our scrap comes was fitted with the canons in the form of a harmony at the foot of the page, just as we find it in Codd. EMTbWd, and in many Syriac Codices. And further since the part pf the text to which the harmony refers is Matt. xiv. 22, it follows that the original MS. when perfect must have been a large one, con taining perhaps nearly fifty lines on a page.
From the normal structure of the lines it may be assumed that the MS. did not read la^vpov in line 9 ; whether Kal should be inserted in line 10 is doubtful.
X,,. 8.
Two double leaves of uncial writing, each page measuring 10 in. x 7 A in. nearly. The writing is a delicate sloping uncial of the eighth or ninth century ; the text being accentuated, perhaps by a second hand, the circumflex accent being written for the grave, and the accented diphthong bearing the accent on the first letter, as often occurs in MSS. of this period. A later hand has occasionally made corrections, such as the addition of rfj before <f)v\a/cfj in Fol. 2 verso, line 2 ; and on the 18th line of the same page eiTrev is written over the words £09 ^OL A few liturgical directions may also be found on the margin.
These two double leaves would seem to be the first and third leaves of a quaternion of the original MS.
No. 9.
A fragment, one leaf of an early bilingual uncial MS. of the Gospels : measuring 10£ in. by 8£. The MS. may be referred to the ninth century. It is thus of especial interest as furnishing what is perhaps the oldest known example of an Arabic version of the New Testament. The Arabic text seems to be an original one ; it does not agree exactly with any version already in print, nor with Ciasca's edition of the Arabic Tatian Harmony. Possibly it may be (as often happens with bilingual Codices) a lectionary, in which the Greek text has been translated line for line into Arabic ; unfortunately, however, the single leaf which we have copied, does not contain any place where a liturgical note could occur ; the age of the MS. also seems to militate against the idea of an Arabic lectionary1.
No. 10.
This consists of nine leaves of a palimpsest MS. of the Gospels, in which the ancient Greek writing of the fifth century has been replaced by a Syriac text. Taken together they comprise four double leaves and a single leaf.
1 For the transcribed page of Arabic I am indebted to the co-operation of my friend Prof. Rogers.
b2
Denoting the missing leaves of the quaternions to which these pieces belonged by asterisks, we have
* 1, 2 * * 3, 4 * for the first quaternion, then a quaternion lost, after which
5, 6 * * * * 7 * and then
*j$####c)#
The fragments form therefore portions of three separate qua ternions.
The writing is in double columns of twenty-five lines to the page. On the margin stand the Ammonian numbers, but apparently no Eusebian canons : but these were probably written in red paint, and the MS. being palimpsest, may have been washed out.
The initial letter at the beginning of the paragraphs is a capital letter and stands back a little from the line : there is also an occasional mark of punctuation, viz. the high point.
No. 11.
Two leaves of a sixth century MS. of the Gospels, the first of the leaves having lost its upper half. The second leaf, having been folded in the middle when used to bind some other MS., has become illegible where it was folded. The hand is a large bold script, and the MS. from which the fragments came must have been a very fine one. The text is broken into short commata which are distinguished by a mark of punctuation : occasionally there are traces of the use of a colon as a mark of punctuation, and of an aspirate or perhaps a diacritic mark, (see the third line of Fol. 1, recto) : we have printed this last as if it were an aspirate, but with some hesitation ; it looks more like the pair of dots which denote initial iota connected by a scribe's flourish. The second leaf shews the smooth breathing in its early square form : see line 15 of the recto of the leaf. The MS. shews the itacism of ai for e as is common in early uncial texts (e^erat for e%ere).
No. 12.
Three' fragments of an early MS. of the Gospels written in a remarkable half-uncial hand, which has no parallel anywhere that I know of except perhaps in a MS. of which Tischendorf gives a specimen in Monumenta 8acra, Coll. Nov. Vol. I. Plate iii. No. 4, and which he compares with the hand of a Vatican MS. of the prophets, figured by Cardinal Mai in Pair. Nov. Bibl. iv. between pp. 320 and 321. Tischendorfs MS. is referred by him to the seventh century and the matter of his text is ii. and iii. Regg.
Our MS. has no accents, breathings or punctuation ; it is however fitted with the Eusebian and Ammonian numbers on the margin ; the former being in rubric. A reference to Fol. 1, verso, col. 1, line 10, will shew the use of the apostrophus as a syllable-breaker just as we have it in the Codex Sinaiticus. Quotations are marked on the margin by ». The vellum is much worn and torn, so that the text cannot always be read : the text, however, where it can be read is extremely ancient. In Fol. 2, recto, col. 2, line 17, the letter which I have marked by brackets is almost illegible, but I do not think it is <£.
In Fol. 3, col. 2, line 3, pveiov seems to be a mistake for ^VT]^LOV and in the last line but one of the same page my transcript shews /jLvrj/j, for /2A.77/U, but this may be an error of my own ; the right-hand side of the column is cut away.
No. 13.
A fragment of papyrus, containing a sentence from the Gospel of Luke or from some patristic writer quoting the Gospel of Luke. As the fragment ends with a scribe's prayer, and it is not the right place to conclude a lectionary, or a copy of the Gospels we may infer that it is a patristic extract. The hand is a sloping uncial, with some curious forms intermingled from the so-called papyrus-cursive; e.g. Y has the looped form which we often find for an abbreviated OY in Greek uncial MSS.: which is generally taken to be derived from the superposition of Y over 0 ; it would seem however to be rather borrowed from the papyrus script. I do not know how to date the scrap with confidence, but perhaps it may be as old as the seventh century.
No. 14.
These seven tiny fragments of a papyrus MS. of the first epistle to the Corinthians have been released from the binding of some book in which they had been glued together. Sometimes the writing on a fragment has come off on an adjacent fragment, and in this way the letters can be read when they are illegible on the piece itself. We may assign the fragments, provisionally, to the fifth century.
No. 15.
We have added under this head a reprint of the so-called Brugsch fragments of the Sinaiticus, in order to make these relics of the fourth century more accessible than they can be in the Brugsch edition,
xiv
in its
which is made up to match the great edition of the Sinaiticus in its dimensions, as well as to correct some errors into which Brugsch has fallen. The MS. is certainly very ancient, nearly as early as the Codex Sinaiticus, we may well believe. The size of the leaves at present is 8f in. x 6£ in. ; but they have been a good deal cut. As to the punctuation marks and other peculiarities of the text they can be inferred from our printed representation.
No. 16.
This fragment is a double leaf of an ancient Palestinian MS., and contains a part of a hitherto unknown Syriac version of the Pauline Epistles.
In its present condition the size of the fragment is six inches by nine; but the original must have been much larger, as the text was arranged on each page in double columns, and only a few letters of the second column of the cut page can now be made out. Perhaps we shall not be far wrong in referring the MS. to the viiith century : further discoveries in regard to this version may be expected, as there are palimpsest fragments of a similar Palestinian script in the Sinaitic library. The hand is a fine one, and with a little practice in such peculiar calligraphy the under-writing of these fragments ought not to be difficult of transcription. As there is no Palestinian type, I am obliged to use the Estrangelo letters in my copy.
With regard to the version contained in this fragment we may say that it is closely related to the Jerusalem Syriac of the Gospels pub lished at Verona in 1861 by Mineschalci Erizzo from a Vatican MS. It agrees with it in its verb formations as, for example, in the use of the preformative Yud instead of Nun in the future tense: see, for example, Fol. 1 a, col. 1, line 8, iav-^-. : line 7, ^^O-tcv-^.,. It makes the suffix of the first person plural in cm ; see Fol. 2 b, col. 2, line 5 oni'cWA ; and compare the remark of the editor of the Jerusalem Syriac, p. xxxvi : " pronomen primae personae pluralis, sive solum sive affixum nunquam juxta correctionem Aramaicum ^IAJ vel ^ adhibetur, sed semper Hierosolymitanae dialecti propria forma coir** vel cru."
Nor is the resemblance merely confined to grammatical forms: it extends to the connective particles, adverbs &c. ; and to the words employed in the translation of the Greek. Thus we find 11^ and -.1 (for ^.t) as everywhere in the Jerusalem Syriac; l*.irA as in Syr. Hier. of John xv. 1; cW for Aur^; r^sa.** for K'V-U ; cW»ivx. for r^ir.; K'ioflo^ for K^i^oo ; K^o for rdLl*Xa_S* (see Syr. Hieros. in Luke xxiv. 49) and the like
We may observe also that there arc paleographic resemblances between the two scripts, although the Vatican MS. seems to be much later and more carelessly written than ours: such are the employment of the diacritic point with Risk and not with Dolath: cf. Syr. I Hems. p. vi:"quod Dolath plerumque puncto diacritico careat." Notice ;il>n the double form of the letter Pli e ; for although in our text as in Fol. 1 b, col. 2, line 4, it has the common Syriac form, yet in Fol. 1 a, col. 2, 11. 8, 10 we can read the beginning of the word ooi..^^ and the letter ^ has been differentiated from its normal shape. Cf. Hieros. p. vi : " et Phe, eo quod una tantum forma apud Hebraeos et Syros gaudeat, prout TOV F aut P potestatem habet ad diversitatem pronunciations in- dicandam, binis litteris distinguit."
We may say, then, that our fragment is a part of the complete Palestinian version of the New Testament, of which the so-called Jerusalem Syriac preserves to us the Gospels, and of which Dr Land has published a fragment of the text of the Acts of the Apostles in his Anecdota S-yriaca (Vol. iv. p. 168).
In concluding these brief notices it may be well to add that there is a large amount of uncial lectionary matter in the Convent, both in fragments detached from other books, and in complete texts. Of these we have frequently taken copies, and had even gone so far as to set some of them up in type, but upon reflection we have decided to confine our attention as far as possible to actual MSS. of the Biblical text, other than those which are made for liturgical use. The texts of these last are of much less value, and the MSS. are by no means of so high an age. We might moreover have doubled the size of the book by including them, which would by no means have been an unmixed blessing to ourselves or to others.
In the hope that these pages may be of some service to the workers in the cause of Biblical criticism which we have so constantly at heart, we commend them to the small constituency for which they were designed.
CORRIGENDA.
Page 41, col. 1, lines 12, 13, read
YMINOTITTA
Page 48, heading, read
No. 12. Fol. 1, recto. Id. col. 2, line 15, read
I NA6IAYN
No. 1.
ENAnAEIC[ME]
[NOjCEICnOAEMONENA
[TIK]Y-KAIKATAKYPIEY
[CH]TETHCrHCAnENAN 5 [TIY]MAN • KAIA-flCETE
[AY]TOICTHNrAAAAAEN
[KA]TACXECEI
[EA]NAEMHAIABACINE[Nn]
[nA]EICMENOIME0YM^ 10 [El]CnOAEMONENANTIKY [KA]IAIABlBACHTETHNAnO [CK]EYHNAYTANKAITAC [rY]NAlKACAYTAN- KAITA [KT]HNHAYTANnPOTE
15 [PA]YMANEICrHNXANAAN [KAJICYNKATAKAHPONO [MH]0HCONTAIENYMIN [ENFHXANAAN]
fNumbers xxxii. 29, 30.]
S. I.
No. 2.
[TAII]NG
AZApy i OYAAPCO[NTTA]
[p]eC7HKCOC€N...
[Judg. xx. 22.] [Judg. xx. 28.]
[KOoAe]r[oNTecempo]
[e i n] e N [K c A N A B H T e]
npocAy[TOYCKAinpoc]
HA60Noi[Yi'oiiHAnpoc]
10 THH[MepATHA6YTe]
pA'KAie[2HA90NOl]
[Y'i]oi[B]eN[iAMiNeic] CYNANT[HCINAYTOIC]
15 KAiAie(f)[9eipANAno]
nANre[coYTOieA]
20 KONTe[cpOMC|)AIAN]
KAIANe[BHCANTTANTec] OIYl'oi[lHAKAinACO] AAOC[KAIHA60N]
25 CANK[AieKA0ICAISl]
eK6ie[NCOniONKYKAl]
HMe[pA€KeiNH...]
[Judg. xx. 24—26.]
No. 3.
Col. 1. tf ate tneN TOON OMATOY
Col. '2.
T/cracHMepONBooz'
CTTiTtWKOO • OTl[oy]
10
OANHpeKTOONAfX'
15
KateineNpOY9npo[c]
Tr/NTTGNGepANAY
O\OI^TON[AM]HTON
eiTT€NNOe[MM I N]
20
25
80 GeCMGTATCONKOpA CIOONAYTOYKAIOY KAnANTHCONTAICOl
e N A r p w e T e p Cxi KAinpoceKoAAH0H
35 pOY6TOICKOpACI OICTOYBOOZTOY
pICMONTOiNKplBOL) 40 KAITCONHYPOON KAI€KA6lC€NMeTA THCTTGNeepACAY THC
ein .
M€ . THC
pr) y v (o p I c 9 H c T GO A
<y e t v K a \ T o Y n i e i N
MH9HVAIAYTON • KAI [r]NCOCHTONTOnON [o]YKOt/iATAI6K6l •
KAIAHO
TTOAOONAYTOY ' KAI KOIMH9HCHKAIAY
TocAnapreAeicoi
ATTOietC-
EineNAepOY9npoc
AYTHI/HANTAOCA
KAIKATeBHCeic[THNJ
AAcoNa/cAienomfceN
KATA7TANTAOCA6N6
9epAAYTHC
9HHKapAlAAYTOY
[Ruth ii. 19— 23; iii. 1,4—7.]
1—2
No. 4. (a)
[Ps. ci. 3, 4.]
No. 4.
rove/Air t7r\a)VTae vciy a@o IST ijv
[Ps. cii. 5—8.]
No. 4. (c)
AYTOICKC [KAl]eMirHCANeNTOICe9NeCINKAI
O K
[KAie]r€NH9HAYTOl[cei]cCKANAAAON
GYfATepACAYTOiNTOICAAIMONIOIC KAie2e)(eANAIMAAB(OON 10 al
/cat€({)ONOKTONH6HHrHeNTOICAIMACT
15 KAICOpriC6H6YMOOKCeTTITONAAONAYTOY KAieBAHAYSATOTHNKAHpONOMIANAYTOY
20
7TA,60NAK6ICepYCATOAYTOYC
[Ps. cv. 34—43.]
No. 4. (d)
5 KAieK6KpA5eNnpOCKN6NTCx)eAl[BeC0Al]
KAieKTOON A NArKOONAYTOONeCOOCGN AYTOYC AneCTlAeNTONAOfONAYTOYKAIIACATO
10 KAieppYCATOAYTOYC6KT<JONAlA(|)90pOON
ATAAAlACCI [oi]KATABeNONTAIC€ICTHN[6AA]ACCANeN
nAoioic
KAITAOAYMACIAAYTOYTOICYIOICTCOANOiN 15
20
25
[Ps. cvi. 17—26.]
No.
M
KAITTACAHCO({)IAAYT60NKATeTTO6H
KAieClfHCeNTAKYMATAAYTHC 10
MATOCAYTOY
KAITA9AYMACIAAYTOYTOICYIOICTCONAI/&)I/ YYOOCATOOCANAYTONeNeKKAHCIAXaOf
15 KAieNKAOeA
CANAYTON
eeeronoTAMOYceicepHMON
20 ATTOKAKittCTOON ..........
[Ps. cvi. 27—34.]
No. 4.
[MOCY]NONAYTOY
AN6(JONOYKeMN[HC6HTTOlHCAieAeOc]
NATOOCAI
^7/o-eratAnAYTOY
10 KAieNeAYCCtTOKATApANOOCIMATION
AGTAI
15 KAI<JOCeiZOONHHNAlATTANTO<rTTeplZCONNi;TCU
[Ps. cviii. 15—21.]
No. 4. (0) and (A)
[oiK]ocAA[p]coNHAniceNeTTiKN
Men o \TOVKVH \-n\cav67r i, tcv
euXorHceNTONO I/CON Aapooz/
e i; X o 717 (7 e N n A N T a c T o Y o" 0 o yQ o v
10
e<f) vfjiasfc A I eTTtrar e K [N A] e fX, o 7 ?; /i e N o i uyu, [e i] c T oo K co
T ft) 7T 0 fc H C a I/ T I T 0 ^ 0 Y P A N 0 N K a I T f) V <y 1) V 15 OOl'/3ANO<?TOfOt'pANOYTtO/lC&>
[Ps. cxiii. 18—26.]
S. I.
10
No. 4.
o)Ace
[o] K C K A I A I K A I O C
10
O T t [e] 2[l]AATOTHNYYXHNM°YeK^az'aTOl;
15
en[i]cTeycAAioeAAAHCA e rw Ae [e]jAn [i N oo 6 H N] c 0 o [A PA] 20
[Ps. cxiv. 3— cxv. 2.]
11
No. 5. Fol. 1, recto.
Col. 1. Col. 2.
CO<HAIHCOYYIOYCIPAX DACA[CO4>IAnAPAKY] KAIMETAYTOYEICTON AIANA
AMMON0AAACCAN KAICTAFONACYETOY KAIHM[EPACAIANOC] [TICEZAPI0MHCEI] YtOCOYNOYKAinAA TOCTHCKAIABYCCON K AICO^IANTICEZI XNIACEI
nPOTEPAHANTANEKTI CTAICO4>IA KAICYNECIC4>PONH CEACjEHAIANOC PIZACO*|ACTINIAnE KAAY^GH
KAITAnANOYPFEYMA [TAAYTHCTICEFNA] EICECTICO^OC c^OBEPOCC^OAPA KAGHMENOCEniTOY 6PONOYAYTOY KG- AYTOCEKTICENAYfR KAIEIAENKAIEHHPI GMHCENAYTHN KAIEZEXEENAYTHN EnmANTATA[EPrA]AYTOY METAnACHCCAPKOCKA TATHNAOCINAYTOY KAIEXOPHTHCENAYTHN TOICAFAnACINAYTON 4>OBOCKYAOZAKAI KAYXHMA KAIEY4>POCYNHKAI [CTE4>ANOCArAAAIA] MATOC
[A NAOK AMEN TANK AT A] THNEPMHNEIANnE4>IAO nONHMENANAEZEAN AAYNAMEINOYTAPICOAY 5 [NAMEIAYTAEAYTOICE] BPAICTIAETOMENAKAI OTANMETAX0HEICETEPAN FAACCANOYMONONAE TAYTAAAAAKAIAYTOCO
10 NOMOCKAIAinPO4)HTEIAI KAITAAOinATAN[BIBAIAN] OYMIKPANEXEITHNAIA 0OPANENEAYTOICAEFO MENAENTAPTAOrAOA
15 KAITPIAKOCTAETEIE niTOYEYEPTETOYBACI AEACnAPArENHGEIC EICAirYnTONKAICYrXPO NICACEYPONOYMIKPAC
20 nAIAEIACA*[OMOIONAN] ArKAIOTATON[E0EMHN] KAIAYTOCTINAnPOCENEF KAC0AICnOYAHNKAI4>l AO[nONIAN]TOYME0EP
25 MHNEYCAITHNAETHN BIBAON[nOAAHNTAP] AFPYHNIANKAIEni CTHMHNnPOCENETKA MENOCENTAAIACTH
30 MATITOYXPONOYHPOCTO EninEPACAFArONTATO BIBAIONEKAOC0AIKAI TOICENTHHAPOIKIABOY AOMENOIC4>IAOMA0EIN
35 HPOKATACKEYAZOME NOYCTAH0HENNOMAC BIOTEYEIN
[Sirach prol. — i. 11.]
2—2
12
No. 5. Fol. 1, verso.
Col. 1. Col. 2.
4>OBOC"KVTEPy[El] KTA
[KA]PAI[AN] ....
KAIAnCEIEY4>POCY ....
NHNKAIXAPANKAI ....
5 MAKPOHMEPEYCIN .... Tn4>OBOYMENnTON
KNEYECTAIEnECXATAN KAIENHMEPATEAEYTHC [AYTOYEYPHCEIXAPIN] 10 APXHCO4>IAC4>OBEI
[CGAITONetsi] KAIMETAniCTANEN MHTPACYNEKTIC0H AYTOIC
KTA
[Sirach i. 12—14.]
13
No. 5. Fol. 2, recto.
Col. 1.
KAIENTOICXEIAECI
COYHPOCEXE
MHEZYtOYCEAYTON
[iNAMHnECHCKAl •5 EnArAFHCTHtYXH
COYATIMIAN]
KAIAIlOKAAYyElKC
TAKPYFITACOY
KAIEMMECnCYNAfn 10 THCKATABAAEICE
OTh3YnPOCHA0EC*0 , BAl<Y
KAIHKAPAIACOY
flAHPHCAOAOY 15 TEKNONEHIPOCEPXH
AOYAEYEINKA
ETOIMACONTHNtYXHN . COYEICHEIPACMON
EY0YNONTHNKAPAIAN 20 COYKAIKAPTEPHCON
KAIMHCHEYCHENKAI
pAEnArnn-ic
KOAAH0HTIAYT/1KAI
MHAnOCTHC 25 INAAYZHGHCEnECXA
TANCOY
nANOEANEnAX0HCOI
AEHAI
KAIENAAAAFMATITAni 30 NACEACCOYMA
KPO0YMHCON
OTIENHYPIAOKIMA
ZETAIXPYCOC
KAIANOIAEKTOIENKA 35 MINATAHEINACEAC
niCTEYCONAYTAKAl
Col. 2.
ANTIAHMtETAICOY
KAIEY0YNONTACOAOYC
COYKAIEAniCON
EHAYTON
OI4>OBOYMENOI~KN
ANAMINATETOEAEOC
KAIMHEKKAINHTE
INAMHRECHTE
OI*OBOYMENOli<N
niCTEYCATEAYTA
KAIOYMHRECHOMI
C00CYMAN
OI4>OBOYMENOIKN
EAniCATEEICArA0A
KAIEICEY4>POCYNHN
AIANOCKAIEAEOYC
EMBAEtATEEICAPXAIAC
TENEACKAIEIAETE
TICENEniCTEYCEN"KA
KAIKATHCXYN0H
HTICENEMINENTA
^OBAAYTOYKAIEF
KATEAI*0H
HTICEnEKAAECATOAYTON
KAIYHEPEIAENAYTON
AIOTIOIKTEIPMAN
KAIEAEHMAN[O"KC]
KAIA^IHCINAMAPTI
ACKAICAZEIEN
KAIPA0AiyEAC
OYAIKAPAIAICAIAAIC
KAIXEPCinAPIMENAIC
KAIAMAPTAAAEHIBAI
NONEHIAYOTPIBOYC
OYAIKAPAIACIAPIMENH
[Sirach i. 29— ii. 13.]
14
No. 5. Fol. 2, verso.
Col. 1.
Col. 2.
OTIOYniCTEYEI AlATOYTOOYCKEriA C0HCETAI OYAIYMlNTOICAriO 5 AAAEKOCITHNY (1OMONHN
KAITinOIHCETAIOTAN EniCKEdTHTAIOKC OI$OBOYMENOl]<N
10 OYK[AnEI0HCOYCI PHMATANAYTOY] KAIOIATAnANTECAY TONCYNTHPHCOYCI TACOAOYCAYTOY
15 OI^OBOYMENOIKN ZHTHCOYCINEYAO KIANAYTOY KAIOIATAnANTECAY TONEMHAHCeHCON
20 TAITOYNOMOY OI*OBOYMENOI"KN ETOIMACOYCIKAP AIACAYTAN
KAIENAniONAYTOY 25 TAniNACOYCITAC tYXACAYTAN EMHECO^MEeAEIC XEIPACKYKAIOYKEIC XEIPACANAN 30 ncrAPHMEfAAACY NHAYTOYOYTAC KAITOEAEOCAYTOY EMOYTOYHPCAKOY CATETEKNA
35 KAIOYTACnOIHCATE INACA0HTE
OTAPKCEAOZACEnPA
EHITEKNOIC
KAIKPICINMPCECTE
PEACENE45YIOIC
OTIMANnPAEZIAACKE
TAIAMAPTIAC
KAIACAHOeHCAYPIZA
OAOE:AZANM7AAYTOY
OTIMANnPAEY4)pAN
GHCETAIYnOTEKNA
KAIENHMEPAHPOCEY
XHCAYTOYEICAKOY
C0HCETAI
OAOZAZANDPAMAKPO
HMEPEYCEI
KAIOEICAKOYANKT
ANAHAYCEIMPAAYTOY
KAIACAECnOTAICAOY
AEYCEIENTOICfEN
NHCACINAYTON.
ENEPTAKAIAOrATI
MATONfT^ACOY
INAEnEA0HCOIEYAO
riAHAPAYTOY
EYAOriArAPflPCCTHPI
ZEIOIKOYCTEKNA
KATAPAAEM^CEKPI
ZOI0EMEAIA.
MHAOHAZOYENATI
MIARPCCOY
OYTAPECTICOIAOHA
HPOCATIMIAN
HrAPAOZAANOYEKTI
MHCfTPCAYTOY
ONEIAOCTEKNOIC
MHTHPENAAOHIA
[Sirach ii. 13— iii. 11.]
15
No. 6.
TiceniriNooc
K6I .
5 AHTAIOYCA
nANTGCOIKO TTIOONTGCKAI
10 nec{)opTiCMe [Matt. xi. 27, 28.]
16
No. 7.
[KjAIKATABAO-aTTOTOU
5
10
NOCKATATTOt'Ti^'e
K 6 C 00 C 0 V/A € € V 6 €
oocAecu? ....
* fr
[Matt. xiv. 28—31.]
17
No. 8. Fol. 1, recto.
oAeATTOKpieeiceineNAYTOic
OCTTei'pOONTOKAAONCTTep
ArpOCeCT?NOKOCMOCTo[AeKA]
5 AoNcnepMAOYTOieiciNfoi]
YIOITHCBAClAeiAC.[TAAe]
ZIZANIA€IC?NOIY'IOI[TOY]
10
AICONOC6CT?N • OlAe0epl[cTAl]
15
20 [cKANAAAAKAITOYCnOIOYNTAc]
[Matt. xiii. 37—41.]
18
No. 8. Fol. 1, verso.
THNANOMl'ANKAlBAAOYCI AYTOYCeiCTHNKAMINONTOY
TTYpoceKe?ecTAiOKAAY0MOC
5
OOCOh'AlOCeNTHBAClAeiA
nAAlNOMOl'A6CT?NHBAClAeiA
10
15
TTAAlNOMOIAeCTINf-' BAClAeiA
PITAC •
20 TIMONMApfApeiTHNAneA
[Matt. xiii. 41—46.]
I!)
No. 8. Fol. 2, recto.
VAKa}SoCKAli'a>CHCKAICl[MOC>'N] KAIAIAAeA4>A?
5 TATAYTA • KAieCKANAA
AIZONT06NAYTCO • OA6IC6I
4>HTHCATIMOCeiMH6NTH nATplAlAYTOYKAieN[THOl] 10 Kl'AAYTOYKAIOYKenOl[HC€N]
€KeiAYNAMeiCnOAAACAlA[THN]
N oo T to K A i p 03 H K o Y c e N [H p oo]
AHCOT€TpAp)(HCTHNAKo[HN] 15 IY • KAieTneNTOICTTAICINAY
TOY • OYTOCeCT?NIOC)[ANNHCo] BATTTICTHC-AYTOc[hrep6HATTo] N -KAlAl[ATOYTO]
20
[Matt. xiii. 55 — xiv. 3.]
3—2
20
No. 8. Fol. 2, verso.
THCACTONl'GOANNHNeAH
AAKHAlAHpGOAlAAATHNfY
5 00YAYTOY:
TOOOICOANNHCOYKeleCTIN
coiexe i NAYTHN •
10 THNAYTON6?)(ON :
AOY THCHpOOAlAAOCeNTOOMeCO)
KAiHpeceNTCOHpcoAH • dei 15 MeeopKOY^MoAofHceNAY
THAOYNAIOGANAITHCHTAI
HAenpoBiBAC0e?CAYnoTHC
MpCAYTHCAOCMOICflHCIN [(JO AeJeTTITTINAKITHNKe 20 [0AAHN ..................... ]
[Matt. xiv. 3—8.]
21
No. 8. Fol. 3, recto.
OTTeTpocnepieTTATHceNeTTi
TAYAATAeA6e?NTTpOCTON
IN • BAencoNAeroNANeMO
VCXYPON€(J>OBH0H • KAlAp 2AMeNOCKATATTONTl'zec[6Al]
eKpAleNAerooiMKeccocoN Me • eYQeoocAeoiceKTeiNAC
10 eicrieAeicTACAc • KAIGM
BANTCONAYTCONeiCTOTTA[oi6]
eKonAceNOANeMoc -oiAeeN TconAoiooeAGoNTecnpoce
15
20 ...............
[Matt. xiv. 29—35.]
22
No. 8. Fol. 3, verso.
TTpOCHNerKANAYTOOTTAN TACTOYCKAKWCeXONTAC • K TTApeKAAOYNAYTON'INAMO 5
• 15
OCOIHY<\NTOAieCO)6HCAN
10 MAT6?CKAI(})AplCAIOlAerO
T6C • AlAT?OIMA0HTA?COYTTA
15
CIN • oAeATTOKpi6eceirre
AYTOIC • AlAT?KAIYMe?CTTA
20 .............
[Matt. xiv. 35 — xv. 3.]
No. 8. Fol. 4, recto.
THNTTApABoAHNTAYTHN
oAeicei'neN • AKMHNKAIY Meic-AcyNeToiecTe-oynoo
OMeNONGICTOCTOMAeiCTH
eT- KAieiCA(})e GK BAA ACT A i
TTOpeYOMeNAeKTOYCTOMA 10 TOC6KTHCKApAl'ACe2epX€TAI KAK€INAKOINO?TONANON •
(J)6
NOI • MOiyeiAi • nopNeiAi • K[AO] lo HA? • YeyAoMApTYpiAi • BA[AC]
0HMIAI -TAYTAeCT?NTAK[oi] NOYNTATONANON -TOAeA[Nl]
nTOicxepc?N(|)Are^N -OYK[OI]
NOITONANON- KAie2eA[0O)]
'20 enei'
[Matt. xv. 15—21.]
24
No. 8. Fol. 4, verso.
[eiCTAMepH]TYpOYKAIClAOC>NOC
KAIIAOYrYNH)(ANANAl'A
ATTOTOONOplCONeKei'NOON
5
AAlMONIZeTAI-OAeOYKA
KAI
[TTpOc]eA60NTeCOIMA6HTAl 10 AYTOYHpOOTHCANAYTON
[oTIK]pA2eiOniC66NHMOON
[necJjAAHNeiMHeiCTAnpo
15 BATATAAnoACOAOTAOIKOY
[mA]HAenpoceA6oYCAnpo
[KeB]on6eiMoi 20
[Matt. xv. 21—26.]
25
No. 9. (Recto.)
Col. 1. Col. 2.
TIMONMAPTAPITHN
AnEAeANHEnPAKE
flANTAOCAEIXEN
KAIHTOPACENAYTON 5 TTAAINOMOlAECTIN
HBACIAEIATANOY
NTiNT-CAriNHBAH Arabic
0EICAEICTHN0AAAC
CAN • KAIEKHANTOC 10 [rENOYCCYNAFArOY]
CA- HNOTEEnAHPA
0H- ANABIBACANTEC
EniTONAiriAAON.
KAIKA0HCANTEC 15 CYNEAE^ANTAKA
AAEICAfriA-TAAE
CAnPA^EZAEBAAO •
[Matt. xiii. 46—48.]
S. I.
26
No. 9.
(Verso.)
Col. 1. Col. 2.
[OYTAJCECTAIENTH [C]YNTEAEfATOYAlA
NOCTOYTOY-EZE JU11
5 AEYCONTAIOIAT LoJ! .
TEAOIKAI/UoPlOY
CINTOYCnONHPOYC
EKMECOYTANAI
K]AinNKAIBAAOYCl 10 [AYTOYC]EICTHNKA
[MINONTOYnYPOC]
EKEIECTAIOKAAY
eMOCKAIOBPYTMOC
TjANOAONTAN 15 AE]rE!AYToTc6rC-
CYNHKATETAYTA AS \JJD
nANTA-AEFOY I
CINAYTA-NAlKE- [^l^
OAEEinENAYTOIC- ^ JlS
[Matt. xiii. 49—52.]
27
10
15
20
25
Col. 1.
ceNeyOecoc nopeyeeic AeoTAneN
T6TAAANTAAA
T06NAYTOIC
KAie«epAH
T€COC[AYT<JOC] KAIOTAAyO €KepAHC£N KAIAYTOCAA
AAAyo • oAe [TO€N]AABOON
PY26N6NTH
plONTOYKY
MeTAAeno
p 1 0 C T CO N A 0 Y
No. 10. Fol. 1, recto.
Col. 2.
KAICYNAIp[ei] M6TAYTOJN AOfON • KAI
np[oce]Ae[o"j]
OTAn6NT€ TAAANTAAABO>
npocHNer
KeNAAAATT€N T6TAAANTAA6
T6TAAANTA
MOIHApeAtO
KACIA6AAAA
n6NT6TAAA
TAGKepAHCA
6HAYTOIC •
HCTTICTOC
enmoAAooN
C 6KATACTHCO>
€iceA6eeic
[Matt, xxv. 15—21.]
4—2
28
THN)(ApAN
ToyKYpioy coY-rrpoc
5 OTAAyOTAAA
TTAYTOICe
AYOTAAANTA MOITTApeAOO
KAceiAeAAAA 10 AYOTAAANTA
15
nicroceni noAAooNce
20 KATACTHCCO
eiceAOeeic
25
BeKAinicre
npoceASoa AeKAioroe
No. 10. Fol. 1, verso.
Col. 2.
TAAANTON6I AH0COC6I
CCOTICKAH
poceiANepo nocOepizoa
1 CnipACKAICY NAfOONOOe
niCACKAI(|)O
BHOeicAneA
TONCOY6N
)(6ICTOCON
AnoKpieeic AeoKYpioc
OKNHpe • H
Aeicojiee pizooonoY
[Matt. xxv. 21—26.]
29
10
15
20
25
Col. 1. (>YKecnipA
CKOpniCA
eAeiOYNce
BAAeiNTOAp
ZITAICKAieA
OcoNercoe
KOMICAMHN ANT06MON
CYNTOKCO
ApATGOYNA
TTAYTOYTO
TAAANTONKAI
TITAA6KATA AANTA*
TIHANTlAO
BHCGTAIKAI
ceiAiAnoAe
TOYMH6XO
TOC
No. 10. Fol. 2, recto.
Col. 2.
TOY- coB KAITONA'
6KBAA€TAI€lC TOCKOTOCTO
eZeorepoN
€K6I€CTAIO KAAY0MOCKAI
TOONOAONTOO
cor OjANAeeAOH
THAolHAYTOY KAITTANT6C
TAYTOYTOT6 K A 6 I C H 8 TT I OpONOYAO 2HCAYTOY ' KAI
TAieMnpoc6[e] AYTOYTTANT[A]
[Matt. xxv. 26—32.]
30
Col. 1.
TA66NHKAI
Ac{>opiceiAY
TOYCATTAAAH
AooNoocnep
OHOIMHNA
4>opizei TAtrpo
BATAAnOTO) epl(t>OONKAI CTHCelTA
MetsirrpoBA
TA6KAe2ia>
10
15 Toreepeio
20
25
MOYKAHpO
NOMHCATAI
THNHTOIMA
CMGNHNY
MINBAClAlAN
No. 10. Fol. 2, verso.
Col. 2.
ATTOKATABO
AHCKOCMOY
KAieAO)KAT€
enoricATe MeleNOCH
MHNKAICY
TYMNOCKAI
nepieBAAe TAiMencOe
€N(|)YAAKH
HMHN[KAIHA]
6ATAinpOCM€ ToTCATTOKpl 6HCONTAIAY TOOOlAlKAIOI
rroTeeiAoMe
CeniNOONTA
[Matt. xxv. 32—37.]
31
Col. 1.
TOONAZYMOO
rrpocHA6o
OIMA6HTAI
5 recnoYOe AeiceroiMA
COOMeNCo[l]
k* [oAeeine ]
THNHOAlN
npOCTONAl
NAKAl[eiTTATe]
AyroooAlAA CKAAocAerei
OKAIpOCMOY
10
I.-,
20 M6TATOONMA eHTOONMOY KAienOIHCA OIMA6HTAI OOCCYN6TA
25
rrpoccenoi
No. 10. Fol. 3, recto.
Col. 2. KAIHTOIMA CANT()[nAC)(A]
NOM6NHCA N6K€ITOMe TATOONAooAe KAMAOHTO)
0 N T 00 N A Y T 00 €IH€NAMHN
NOIC(})OApA HplANTOAe
KACTOCAYTOO
OeicemeN
M6T€MOYTH
[Matt. xxvi. 17—23.]
32
10
lf>
Col. 1.
TTApAAOOCei
TOY
AN 9 peon to e«eiNo:>AioY o Y i o c T o Y AN6pcorroY
TTApAAlAOTAI
KAAONHNAY
T006IOYK6
ANOpOOTTOC
exeiisioc AnoKpieeic
AYTON6ITT6 M H T I 6 f 03 6 I
No. 10. Fol. 3, verso.
Col. 2. MipABBeiAe
Ec6lONTO)N AGAYTtON/\A B O3 N 0 I C A p TONKAI6YAO THCACeKAA
TOICMA0HTAIC
TOYTOeCTI TOCOOMAMOY
KAIAABOONHO
THplONKAieY XAplCTHCAC
TOYTTANT6C
[c T I T o] A I M A
MOYTOTHC
[KAINHC]AIABH
KHC
[Matt, xxvi. 23—28.]
Col. 1. TonepmoA
N OM € N O N
eicA^eciN
5 AMApTIOON
OTIOYMHTTI OOATTApTieK
TOYTOYTOY
10 f£NNHMATOC
NHCOTANAY
BYMCONKAI
NON6NTHBA
rpoc/woY 20 KAIYMNHCA
T6Ce2HA65
eicjoopoc
ToreAereiAY
25 TOICOICTTAN
No. 10. Fol. 4, recto.
Col. 2.
T6CYMOONCKA
AAAicBHce
6NTHNYKTI TAYTH •
HATA^OOTON
TTOIM6NAKAI
TAnpoBATA
THCnOIMNHC
AlACKOpni
C6HCONTAI •
C[KH] MerAAeroe
eiCTHNfAAl
AAIAN • Ano KpieeicAeo nerpocei n e N A Y T o j emANTec
CKANAAAlCBH CONTAI6NCOI
[Matt. xxvi. 28—33.]
S. I.
Col. 1.
C6HCOMAI6
4>HAYTOOOIC
AMHNAefCO
COIOTI6NTAY
THTHNYKTI
pA({)OONHCAI
NHCH
10 AereiAYTcno nerpoceAN
[A6HM6JCYN COIATTOOANei
15 [NHCJOMAI OMOioocAe
KAIHANTeC OIMA6HTAI6I
noN •
20
NONfeGCH 25 MANCI
No. 10. Fol. 4, verso.
Col. 2. KAiAepeiToic
MA6HTAIC KA0ICATAIAY */ TOY600CAN
KeinpoceY
loaMAIKAIHA pAAABcONTO
OYHplATO
KAIAAHMO NCIN •
roicoicne piAYnocecr
€O)C0ANATOY
M6INATAIOO
MOY • KAinpoceA
[Matt. xxvi. 33—39.]
35
Col. 1.
TTOAlNATTHf flAANTOICAp
XiepeyciN
ATTANTATATe NOMGNA-KAI
T€CM€TATa
npecByre pooNcyMBoy AioNTeAABo recAprypiA
IKANAGAOOKA
TOICCTpATI
COTAICAefON
receiTTATe
OTIOIMA0H
TAiAyroyeA OoNTecNy
10
L5
20 AYTONHMOO
K O I M O3 M e N <i> KAICANAKOY COHTOYTO
25
MONOCHM6IC
No. 10. Fol. 5, verso.
Col. 2.
TTICOM€NAY TONKAiyMAC
nOIHCOMe •
oiAeAABoNjec
nOIHCANOiC
KAlAl6(|)HMI
cBnoAoroc
OYTOCHApA
XplTHCCHM6
poN • oiAeeN
A£KAMA6HTAI
enopeyBH
CAN6ICTHN fAAlAAIANEIC
roopocoye
TA2ATOAYTOIC OICKAieiAON
recAYTONnpoc
GKyNHCAN
AyroNoiAee
AlCTACANKAl
[Matt, xxviii. 11—17.]
5—2
10
15
Col. 1. npoceAeJj
AyjoicAeroo
nopeyeeNTec
CATAIHANTA TAeONHBATTTI 2ONT€CAYTOyC 6ICTOONOMA
ToynpCKAiroy yToyKAiToy
AlAACKONTeC
AyroycTHpeT
HANTAOCAe €TlAAMHNY MIN • KAIlAOY
eiMITTACACTAC
HMepAcecoc
25 THCCYNTeAl AC
No. 10. Fol. 5, recto.
Col. 2. TOyAIOONOC
EYArfEAl ONKATA MAT0AI ON
[Matt, xxviii. 18— fin.]
37
Col. i. eNcoieyAo
KHCA •
TTNAAYTON
eKBAAAeieic
THNEpHMO
KAI H N6 KG I GNTHepHMOL)
CepAKONTA
10
Nocynoroy
CATANAKAIH M€TATCON6H 15 plOONKAIAf
peAoiAiMKo
NOYNAYTO) , MeTAA€TOnA
20 TONIGOANNHN HAOeNICKH pyCCOONTO
THCBA ClA€l
25 ACToyOyAe TOON
No. 10. Fol. 6, recto.
Col. 2. ojinenAH
pCOTAIOKAl
POC[KAIHITI]
KGNHBAClAei
AToyByMe
TANO6ITAIKAI
nicjeyeTAi
TTepinAToo
AenApATHN
BAAACCANTHC
fAAlAAIACGI
KAIAN Ap€AN
TONAAeAc{)d AyToyToyci
MOONOCAM
0IBAAAONTAC
AM(J)lBAHCTpO
£N[TH]OAAAC C[H]HCANTAP AAieic •
ToicoicAeyre
[Mark i. 11—17.]
Col. 1.
OTTICCOMOY K A I TT 0 I H C 00
10
C0AIAAieiC
5 ANOpoonco
KAI€Y6eOJC
A06NT6CTA
AlKTYAAYTOO
HKOAOY0H
CANAYTOO
KAinpoBAce
I'AeNIAKtoBo TONTOYZ6
16
20
IOOANNHN
TONAAeA(j)O
AYTOYKAIAY
TOYCGNTOO
nAOIOOKATAp
TIZONTACTA
AlKTYAAYTCO
6KAAeC€NAY TOYC
No. 10. Fol. 6, verso.
Col. 2.
TONTTpAAYTOO
zeBeAAioN
6NTOOnAOI
MIC000TCON ATTHA00NO HIC03AYTOY
ONTAI6ICKA
TOICCABBACI
eiceAOooN
eiCTHNCY
AIAACK6N
KAielenAHC coNToeni
TOYHNfApAl
AACKOONAY TOYCooceloY
CIAN£)(0)N
[Mark i. 17—22.]
39
Col. l.
TT i p A n T e i e TT i
IMATIOOTTAAAI
ooeiAeMHAi
MAATTAYTOY
TOKAINOIMTOY
TTAAAIOYKAI
KAioyAeic BAAAGIOINO
N6ONGICA
10
15 oyceiAeMH pucceiooi
NOCON€OC TOYCACKOYC KAIOOINOC 20 €KX€ITAIKAI OlACKOIAnO
AOYNTA|A^^A
OINONNeO
eiCACKoyc
25 KAINOycBAH
No. 10. Fol. 7, recto.
Col. 2.
T60N
TTApATTOpey ecBAIAYTON TOICCABBACT AlATOONCno pIMCON KAI H [p]
5ANTOOIMA
HHTAIAYTOY
oAownoieiN
TlAAONTCC TOYCCTAXY ACKAIOI(t)A
picAioieAe
AeTinoioy
CINTOICCAB BACINOOYK6 26CTINKAIAY
ToceAereN
rejienoiH
ceNAAA- ore
[Mark ii. 21—25.]
40
Col. 1.
KAierriNAce AYTOCKAIOI
M6TAYTOY TTOOCeiCHA
0 1 K 0 N T 0 Y
OOCKAITOYC 10 ApTOYCTHC
npoeeceooc
15
O Y C I N •
20 KAieAereN
AYTOICTOCAB BATONAIATO
ANOpOOTTON
CINKAieAoo K6NKAITOIC
25 OY[XOANOC]
No. 10. Fol. 7, verso.
Col. 2. AlATOCABBA
TON[OOCTE]
KCeCTINO YIOCTOYAN
TOYCABBATOY
AieicHAOeN
HAAlNeiCTH CYNArOJfHN KAIHN6K6I
NHN6)(OON THN)(6lpAKAI
TOAYTON6I TOICCABBACI
AYTONINAKA
THfOpHCOO C I N A Y T 0 Y
A N 0 p 03 TT CO
MENHN6XO Tl
[Mark ii. 25— iii. 3.]
41
25
THNOIKIAN
CHTONICXY pONKAITOTe THNOI KIAN
AMHN Aepoo
YMINOTITTA-
5 TTACAI6ANMH
10
15 TAITAAMApTH
[MATA!TOICY
I O I C T CO N A N
OptoTTtoNKAi
AlBAAC(j)HMI 20 AIOCA6ANBAA C<J)HMHCCO CINOCAANBAA C(f)HMHCH eiCTOnNATO
vei
No. 10. Fol. 8, recto.
Col. 2. A(J>eciNeic
TONAIOONA
AAA6NOXOC
6CTINAIO)
oocorieAe
f<) NHN 6YMA AKABApTON
eXei •
€ PXONTAIOY O I A A € A 0 0 I KAIHMHpAY TOYKAieiCO
necreiAAN
npOCAYTON
AYTONKAIG
TOOlAOYH\AH THpCOYKAl
o i A A e A (f> o i
[Mark ui. 27—32,]
S. I.
42
Col. 1.
KAIATT€Kpl 6HAYTOICA6
roiNTicecrT
[HMHJTHpMOY HOIAAeA4>OI
NOCKYKACO
TONKAOHMe
10
I ASHMHpMOY KAIOIAAeA 15 00IMOYOC
CHTOBeAH
20 MI
MHpeCTIN KAIHAAlNHp
lATOAlAACKeT 25 TTApATHNOA
No. 10. Fol. 8, verso.
Col. 2. AACCANKAI
npOCAYTON 0 )( A 0 C TT () A Y C
eMBANTACIC nAOIONKABH COAieiSITHOA
AACCHKAIHAC ()(>)( Ac cnpoc
THN6AAACCA
eniTHCfHC
HCAN •
KAieAiAACKe
AYTOYC6N
TTOAAAKAie
AYTOYAKOY
BeNOcnipoo KAI
TcocnipeiN
[Mark iii. 32— iv. 4.]
43
Col. 1. OTITTOAAOI
TTApeKAAOY
AYTONTTOAAA
5 INAMHATTO
pAc-HNAee
10 pOONBOGKO M6NHTTpOC TOOOpeiKAl
AYTONTTAN 15 T6COIAAIMO NecAeroN
20
HMAC6ICTOYC
eiCAYToyc
6IC6A600M6
KAienefjJpe
Y6NAYTOIC €Y6600COIC KAIGieAOON
No. 10.
Fol. 9, recto.
[Mark v. 9—15.]
Col. 2.
TATATTN6YMA TATAAKA0Ap TA€ICHA6eN 6ICTOYCXOI
MHCeNHAfe
AHKATATOY
THN8AAACCAN HCANAeOOC
6NTH9AAAC
CHKAIOlBO
CKONTeCTOYC
fONKAIAnHf flAANeiCTH
noAiNKAieic
KAIHA90NI
AeiNTiecri
TOfefONOC
KAlepXONTAI
npOCTONIN
6—2
44
'25
No. 19. Fol. 9, verso.
Col. 1.
Col. 2.
|
KAiOecopoY |
TOCAYTOY6IC |
|
|
CINTONAAI |
TonAoioNnA |
|
|
MONIZOM6 |
peKAAeiAYTO |
|
|
NONKA6HM6 |
OAAIMONICBeiC |
|
|
5 |
NONKAIIMA |
INAM6TAYTOY |
|
TICMeNON |
HKAIOYKA({)H |
|
|
KAICtO({)pO |
K6NAYTON |
|
|
NOYNTATON |
AAAAAereiAY |
|
|
6CXHKOTATO |
TCOYHAfeeic |
|
|
10 |
AerecoNAKAi |
TONOIKON |
|
6<j>oBa6H |
coYnpocTOYC |
|
|
CANKAlAlH |
COYCKAIANAf |
|
|
fHCANTOAY |
flAONAYTOIC |
|
|
TOICOIlAON |
OCACOIOKC |
|
|
15 |
Tec[ncoc]ere |
nenoiHKgN |
|
N6TOTCOAAI |
KAIHAGHC6N |
|
|
MONIZOM6 |
ceKAiAnnA |
|
|
NooKAinepi |
BeNKAIHplA |
|
|
T CO N X 0 1 p CO |
TOKHpYCCei |
|
|
20 |
KAIHpSANTO |
GNTHACKA |
|
HApAKAAeiN |
noAeiocAe |
|
|
AYTONAneA |
n[o]lHC€N |
|
|
BeiNATTOTco |
AYTCOOICKAI |
|
|
OpICONAYTO |
nANTeceOAY |
[Mark v. 15—20.]
45
No. 11. Fol. 1, recto.
AOACOKPATHCOYCIN[KAI
AnOKT€INOOCIN.eAerO[N]
AeMH€NTH€OPTHINAMH
00]PY[B]OCr€NH[TAI]eNTCO
[AAGO] TOYAei[Yr]€NO[Me
NOY€NBH0ANIAeNOI[KIA]
CIMCO[N]OCTOYA€nPOY
TTPOCHAOeNAYTGOrYNH
[Matt. xxvi. 4—7.]
No. 11. Fol. 1, verso.
rNOYCAeoiceineNAYTOic
TIKOTTOYCTTAPexeTAITH TYNAIKI -ePrONFAPKAAO
TerAPTOYcnrcoxoYcexe
TTANToreexeTAi • BAAOYCA
TAPAYTHTOMYPONTOYTo
[Matt. xxvi. 10—12.]
46
No. 11. Fol. 2, recto.
eiTTAc-OTieicecT[i
OC-KAIOYKeCTIN AAAOCnAHNAYTOY KAITOArATTANAYTO 6EOAHCTHCKAPAIA[C KAI6EOAHCTHCCYN[e C600C- KAI6EOAHC THCTYXHC- KAI6EO AHCTHC'lCXYOC- [KAITOATAnANTON] nAHCIONGOC€AYTO nAeiON6CTINnANT[GO TCONOAOKAYTGOMA TOON • KAI0YCIOON: KAldrCIAOONAYTON OTINOYNeXCOC, AH[6 KPIOH-eineNAYTOO OYMAKPAN6I, AnOT[HC
[Mark xii. 32—34.;
47
No. 11. Fol. 2, verso.
BACIA6IACTOYOY KA]IOYA6ICOYK6TI
eroAMAAYTONene
PGOTHCAI: KjAIAfTOKPIOeiCOIC €Aer€NAIAACKGON
AeroYciNoirpAM
MAT€K:OTIOXC [YCAAA6CTIN-AYTOC
Anoo-eineNOKC
T(jOKOOMOY-KA00Y
6KAeilCx)NMOY.
eCOCANOCOTOYC
exopoYccoYYno
nOAIONTGONnOAOO COY- AYTOCOYN
[Mark xii. 34—37.]
48
No. 12, recto.
Col. l.
CKAN AAAIC0HCO TAI
AMHNAeCOOCOl OTICyCHMepONTAY T H N Y K T I TT p I N H AlCAAeKTOpA<f>00 NHCAI T p 6 I C M 6 AnApNHCH
OAeeKirepiccooc
10
CYNCOIATT06ANei GYM HCeATTApNH CCOMAI tOCAYTOOC
15 AeKAinANrec
20
25
yrj 6] c H M A N I K A i A e
7et]TOICMA6HTAIC AYTOY KA6ICAT6
ooAeeoocnpoceY
[5]OOMAI
poz
Col. 2.
KAII AKOOBON KAHO3ANNHN M666AYTOYKAI
C8AIKAIAAHMON6I
nepiAYnocecriN
HTYXHM°Y€^>C6A TOYMINAT60oAe
pOA
T6MOY
poe KAinpoeAecoNMiKpo A eTTiTTiTTTeNeTTi[T7797?79
KAinpOCHYXeT[°
AYNATACOl[7ra/3€
TICY
TONTTGTpON
[Mark xiv. 29—37.]
49
No. 12. Fol. 1, verso.
Col. 1.
KAiAereiToorrerpoo c i M co N K A 9 e Y A e i c OYKI'CXYCACMIAN
MHeiceA9HTeeic
pOH neipACMONTOMe
10 HAeCAp2'AC6€NHC
npOCHY^ATOTON
15
20
Col. 2.
OYIOCTOYANOY6IC
AAAOYNTOCHApA
riN6TAIl'OYAAC€IC
TWNAOiAeKAKAl
K A I [-7T/3 €<T/3 VT epw I']
pnB
A i A o Y c A Y T o N [cr v <r
o v a v\ (J) i A H c oo A Y
TOCeCTINKpATH CAT€AYTONKAIA
[Mark xiv. 37 — 45.]
s. I.
50
cir H
ciz
10
No. 12. Fol. 2, recto.
Col. 1.
eNAEKAellOON
K A i e N A e 2 e y oo N y
MOONAYTOY
KAIMeTAANOMOO
eAoncOH
M6NOieBAAC(j)H MOYNAYTONKINOf TeCTACK€(J)AAACAY TOONKAlAerONTGC
15
TONNAONKAIOIKO
AOMOiN€NTplCIN
HMepAICCOOCON
C6AYTONKATABAC
ATTOTOYCTAYpOY
cm OMOIOOCKAIOIAPXI 20 B epeiceMnezoNTec npocAAAnAoYc
AAAOYCeCCOCCN 25 €AYTONOYAYNATAI
ci6
Col. 2. CCOCAIOXCOBACI
• KATABA
p 0 Y I N A 6 1 A 00 M 6 N K A I TT I C T € Y C 00 M €
M6NOICYNAYTOO CONeiAlZONAYTO
N e T o e 4> o A H N T H N
THNGOOCOOpAC 6N ATHC
O6CTINM€6epMH NeYOM€NON06C
reAeinecwfe
[Mark xv. 27—35.]
51
No. 12. Fol. 2, verso.
Col. 1. Col. 2.
ApAMGONAeTICKAl Ml KpO Y K Al I60C H
TOCMHpKAICAAoOMH
AAIAHKOAOY6(>YN AYTOOKAlAlHKO NOYNAYT60KAI ACKA0€AeiNAYTON AAAAinoAAAIAI
oAeiCA(f)eicct)OL)NH CYNANABACAIAYTO>
10 KAITOKATATT6TA CK2 KAI H AHO y lACfG N 0
nApACK€YHO€CTI ejOJCKATCO npOCABBATON€A9o>
ICOCHC}) AHOApl
AYTOCHNnpocAe
[Mark xv. 36—43.]
7—2
52
No. 12. Fol. 3, recto.
Col. 1.
pHCATOTOCCOMATOOlOO CKH CHCf) A CINAONA
THCINAONIKAieGH KGNAYTOeNMNH MIOOOHN AeAATO MHM6NON€Kne
10
CK6 HACMAplAHMA ^* fAAAHNHKAIMA
15
cA TAI KAiAiA[/yei>o H
Col. 2. M I A [ T ft) V (T a /3 /3 a T 0) V ]
T I C A TT 0 [ K V \ i (7 € fc T; //, i t»
AeEioic
MNHM KHN
[Mark xv. 45 — xvi. 5.]
No. 13.
cr i v\ T (o [X] A[a>auTOL»e
+ 10 + iAoyM[eyifci''J?o"]ooTA
Y €A0H€ICTONNOYNCO
KAIAHANTACOI • €Y^AI
TOC -f-
[Luke i. 68(?) 78, 79.]
54
No. 14 a, b and c.
repov TOON AN 6p<airwv 5
\OlAYNATOIOYTToX\Oi
10
Xe2AT006CIN<M<ATat
<r^ u y 77 TO Y c c o (() 8 c K A i
[1 Cor. i. 25—27.]
No. 1-i d and e.
THplOOTHN[a7ro]K6 KpYMM6NH[y]HNOY AlCTOONAp[%o]NT(X)N TOYAIO)NO[9]TOYTOY
10 erNcoK[e]N
[1 Cor. ii. G— 8.]
56
No. 14 /. iS 10 z/vuceoN AH/w>Jre
[1 Cor. iii. 8—10.]
No. 14 .
r o v c h I <\ A o <y i <r \L o v 9
[1 Cor. iii. 20.]
57
No. 15.
Fol. 1, recto.
Col. l.
O O" A N TT p O C € A 6 H A TT O TT A N
C I N 0 I Y I 0 1 1 H A T O) K 0) • K A I 5
HYYXHeKelNHATTeM()Y ertoKCo6cYM^N '
KAIANOCeKTOYCTTepMATOC 10 AApO)NTOY'€peO)CKAIOY
TOCAenpOCHfONOppYHC
ANKA9AplC9HKAIOATTTO M€NOCnACHCAKA6ApCI 15
CnepMATOCHOCTICAN
AVj/HTAinANTOC6pn€TOY
AKA6ApTOYOMIANeiAYTO
20 HenANooeNooMiANeiAY
TONKATATTACANAKAOApCI ANAYTOYvfYXHHTICAN
eo"TAieoocecnepACOYKe
25
ANMHAOYCHTAITOCCOMA
AYTOYYAATIKAIAY9HHAIOC
KAIKAGApOCeCTAIKAITO
30 TlApTOCAYTOYeCTIN
0FH C IM A 1 0 N K A 1 6 H p I A A (0
[Levit. xxii. 3—8.]
H. I.
58
No. 1.5.
Fol. 1, recto.
Col. 2.
T A e r <*> « 9 o $ 9 o a 7 1 a £
AYTOU5
5
J
10
p I o Y o y T o c 4> a7 er a i e K r u> v
15 „ TOY
ATI A p )( 00 N T 00 N a<y I (i) V O V
20
25 TATHNNGOTT/raaUT?;?
30
K ATA fN 01 AN Kat7T/3OCT d^CTe
[Levit. xxii. 9—14.]
59
No. 15. Fol. 1, verso.
Col. 1.
<r ?; i/ X e f CD i> A A A H c ( ) N A A 10
77\l/Tft)NT<JONnpOCK€l
15
20
ap a e v ae K T oo N B o y K o A i
25
o <r a a i/ e^ H M oo M o N e N A Y
[Levit. xxii. 16—21.]
8—2
60
No. 15. Fol. 1, verso.
Col. 2.
€ I (T 8 € K T O V 7T a (7 M 00 M 0 C 0 Y KeCTAI€NAYTOL>TY4>AON HCYNTGTplMMeNON fAoOCCOTMHTONHMYp
KAielCOAOKApnCOCINOY AoOCeTAIATTAYTOONeTTITO. 10 eYCIACTHplONTOOKOi •
KAiMOcxoNHnpo BATON
COTOTMHTONHKOAoBo KCpKONC4>*riATTOIHC€l<r
15
6AAAlANKAI€KTeBAlMMe NONKAI6KTOMIANKAIA
KAie 20 TTITHCI-HCY'MOONOYTTOI
HC6TAI
25
CTINeNAYTOICMOOMOC
KAieAAAHCeNKCTTpOCMGOY 30 CHN AefOON •
KAieCTAienTAHMepAC
[Levit. xxii. 21—27.]
lil
NM. 15.
Fol. 2, recto. Col. 1.
7T/30$ATONAYTHNKAITA
10
15 crBHCOMAieNMCCCOTOa
20 /e
Xer^N • AAAHCONTOIC yioicmAKAiepeicnpoc
«AA€CeT6AYTACKAHTAC 25 a7tACAYTAI€ICIN€()pTAI
THeBAOyLt^CTABBATAANA
[Levit. xxii. 28 — xxiii. 3.]
No. 15. Fol. 2, recto.
Col. 2. K A i e v T 77 TT e y T e K a t 8 e K a T 77
TravepyovXaTpevrovov TT o t TJ o~ e T e /c a t TT p o cr a ^ e
YM IN nay 6/370 v\arp€vrov o Y TT o 1 77 <r e T e
10
15 CHN AefWN et7TOI/TOt9f i
20
25
THCANOicretauroo
[Levit, xxiii. 6 — 12.
03
Col. 1. . . t wave ION c i c o A o K &
10
15
f /Lt 0) y N 0 M I M O N A I CO N
vfj> 0} v K a i a p 1 8 M H c e T A i Y
/Xtl/aTTOTHCenAYplON 20 TftWCra/SBATOONATTOTHC
Ot(T6Te6YCIANN6AN 30 Tft)«O)anOTHCKATOI
o ap T o t»<? e K A Y o A e K A [Levit. xxiii. 12 — 17.]
64
No. 15.
Fol. 2, verso.
Col. 2.
TCMeTATOONapTOONeTTTa
5
A I 6 Y C I A I A Y T a) N K A I A I <T 7T 0 V 10
TIACKAlAYOAMNOYC6I/t
15
20 eCONTAIT(JL)KOL)TO)l6/3et
roonpoccjjepONTiAYTa
AYT03€CTAIKAIKAAeO-e
KAHTHN
25
NOMIMONAItONIONeiO"
YMWNeNnACHTHKATOt 30 K I AY MOON.
KAIOTANeeplZHTGTOI'
35
[Levit. xxiii. 17—22.]
s. I.
65
No. 16. Fol. 1, recto.
Col. 2. Col. 1.
P^ » iT *73
10
.... OK* orUi^b^vat. K* rdX
.... rf.i K'icvori "T.l
[Gal. ii. 7— .] [Gal. ii. 3—5.]
66
No. 16. Fol. 1, verso.
Col. 2. Col. 1.
fAcr> pa
[Gal. ii. 12—14.]
10
15
67
No. 16. Fol. 2, recto.
Col. 1.
orA
10
J3 en* r^^ ..n*n 1 5
[Gal. iii. 17, 18.]
68
No. 16. Fol. 2, verso.
Col. 2. Col. 1.
r^ >*»T*33 coatrtt-).! '.V. 10
.TO en* oV*A r<*ov» .... 15
[Gal. iii. 24—28.]
CAMBRIDGE : PKIXTEI) BY €. J. CLAY, M.A. AND SONS, AT THE UNIVEESITY PRESS
University of Toronto Library
Acme Library Card Pocket
Under Pat. "Ref. Index File" Made by LIBRARY BUREAU
BKVi
t»^2^'
xwVv^vwH^^yS|liB{n
"^»^^v &&&^S$i&&v.----'
i • •» ? *^ p %i ' j, „
»^vSS
SK^ASTO yXv/X^w
_ « *. r * *%*.*3
i
W&«\^
.».t
»\»^VJT>>V
wsstw*
VuHyA
«>
w.v
„,„,:. tW
• ,K«IW.^
.
• ., ; w.»
/.
.
:• p l
• ' ' , • • >
'*vv